InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "bigfoot goes "WHOOP!""

Angel (broodysoul) wrote in somerealityweb,
@ 2021-04-13 09:16:00

Entry tags:

active: angel, active: bonnie bennett, active: draco malfoy, active: emma swan

Network: Angel
So, as it turns out? I still can't tan.

[Bonnie Bennett]

I was able to track down the original curse ritual. There are some ingredients needed that I wasn't able to find, but you may have a source I don't. Nothing else came up about vampires with souls without the spell.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	[Emma \| Angel] theurgy 2021-04-14 12:52 pm UTC (link)
	It's natural, not to associate monstrous beings with people we care about, even if we're faced with it. Change the curse holding him into more of a binding? What have you come up with? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	[Emma \| Angel] broodysoul 2021-04-14 06:39 pm UTC (link)
	Sort of. The idea would be to alter the spell so that it still grants the soul but removes part of the curse. In a sense, the curse has two parts. One is the soul itself, but the second involves the lack of true happiness. If there's a moment of true happiness, the soul disappears. It's the true happiness clause that needs to be removed. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	[Emma \| Angel] theurgy 2021-04-14 07:07 pm UTC (link)
	Basically erasing the chance he can slip out if you accidentally find something that brings you joy. Or not so accidentally? I take it you actually have a witch looking into this? Curses have... layers among layers. Usually with hidden loopholes. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

[Emma | Angel]

broodysoul
2021-04-14 07:47 pm UTC (link)

When it happened a couple years ago back home, it was accidental. I wasn't aware of the clause at the time until it was too late. And yeah, I've been talking to a witch who is a friend. I have access to the original spell, and she's going to take a look to see if it's possible.

There's one thing that I'm not thrilled about. In order for her to work her idea, I'd need to have it removed so she can re-ensoul me without the clause.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

[Emma | Angel]

theurgy
2021-04-14 09:11 pm UTC (link)

Who doesn't like being cursed with something and not knowing all the details? That sounds promising though, at least to an extent.

Ah, so it's a bit like switching it off and back on again. Only switching it off means the potential of carnage and chaos unleashed. Do you need a location to do this? If it's possible. I do have a cave, it's expanded and warded. Held a rather annoying demigoddess with an identity issue in it for a while.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	[Emma \| Angel] broodysoul 2021-04-15 12:53 am UTC (link)
	The coven who originated the spell wasn't too forthcoming with their details. Exactly. He'll take a mile if given an inch, and my worry is that he'll find a way to get out and unleash. Your cave... would actually be perfect. Are you sure you'd want to be involved? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

[Emma | Angel]

theurgy
2021-04-15 01:06 am UTC (link)

I guess I can see their point, but I'm not sure there's a logical reason putting a loophole like that into a curse.

And then he's either slaughtering people you love, and you need to live with it afterwards or... well, someone is killing you. Which sounds like something to leave off the table.

I'm immortal, aloof and magic. I don't mind buying your friends enough time to fix it up. Especially if it means no one is worried about guilt and trauma afterwards.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	[Emma \| Angel] broodysoul 2021-04-15 01:52 am UTC (link)
	Once I did know the loophole? It ensured I focused on being miserable for the rest of my life. Effective vengeance. Yeah, I'd like to select none of the above if I can help it. But if it came to it? I'd rather someone kill me than risk anyone else getting hurt. Thank you. Having a secure place to do this means a lot. I'll let Bonnie know. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	[Emma \| Angel] theurgy 2021-04-15 02:05 am UTC (link)
	Okay, now I'm a tiny bit impressed. Only a tiny bit, and it's definitely the evil bit of me. So my primarily function is ripping out his heart if they can't contain things? At the least, if things are... dicey, it'll take your chompy side a little longer to find an exit. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	[Emma \| Angel] broodysoul 2021-04-15 01:49 pm UTC (link)
	Objectively, so am I. Honestly? Yes. Because I don't know if the others would be able to do it ~~again~~. Here's to hoping it doesn't come to that. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	[Emma \| Angel] theurgy 2021-04-15 10:27 pm UTC (link)
	The benefits of not being emotionally attached, I suppose. I could do it. If needed. Better to have a back up just in case. (Reply to this) (Parent)

(Read comments) -