InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "Use the force, Harry."

Royal (Lelouch Lamperouge) (zeromemories) wrote in sabra_la_tau,
@ 2011-11-05 16:48:00

Entry tags:

!days 280-289, aeris gainsborough, akin iyapo shing kaalnikanjlo, allen walker, aoi 'santa' kurashiki, apollo justice, ashikawa mitsuru, chrono, claude c. kenni, edward elric, ermillina 'snow white' curtana, excel, gokudera hayato, hizumi mizushiro, jace beleren, jake berenson, kanda yuu, kudo shinichi, kuroba kaito, lelouch lamperouge, lenalee lee, masahiro namiki, minami ikki, nabuca, nishi jouichirou, phoenix wright, raenef, selendis, tazendra, temma, wanijima akito, yuffie kisaragi, {{{akatsuki chika}}}

Who: Those invited
Where: Lyvus
When: Day 286, around noon (before the ideal world game)
What: Meeting!

[Sometime between late morning and early afternoon, people are coming over to Lyvus. They'll even feed you if you brought something to trade—there's certainly nice tea and lunch set out :) the main area of Lyvus is pretty big, and there is a long table that can easily sit at least 15-20 people, though it may start to get crowded after that, and some of the chairs are makeshift]

[There may also be some Lyvus/Monoceros makeshift scrabble games going on around lunch. This is clearly the most serious kidnapping.]

[OOCly I have no idea who is actually coming to the meeting and/or knows about it, but I think we are able to roll with bbbasically anything! Join #partyatlyvus so we can keep the blah blah in one place, and we can facilitate any necessary behind the scenes business o7]

[ pre-meeting | meeting start | current options | information sharing | spectators | violence | scowl's announcement | mirror discussion | keystones, etc ]

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] onetruth 2011-11-06 02:29 am UTC (link)
	Do they have proof of that? I don't want us getting in trouble with her. (Sorry I'm not Almaz.) . . . I . . . couldn't say? She may consider it if it benefited her in some way. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] lawfulreception 2011-11-06 02:34 am UTC (link)
	The demonstration was pretty solid, but I'm still iffy. Y-yeah that's what I thought. But what could they offer? Her eyes? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] onetruth 2011-11-06 02:36 am UTC (link)
	Mmm. Our safety is my biggest concern. That's what she wants, isn't it? But they're talking about destroying her, too; they can't have it both ways. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] lawfulreception 2011-11-06 02:42 am UTC (link)
	Scowl says Persona would do it. . .ugh, everything comes down to the Judges. Y-yeah. And I'm not just going to lie to get her over here and be killed. If they find a way to do it, w-well. Good on them? But outright betraying her is wrong. . . (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] onetruth 2011-11-06 02:44 am UTC (link)
	As always. I don't know if I trust her . . . she's the one who runs those games. Outright betraying her is deadly. They need to decide what they think would be more beneficial - her out of their ways, or her on their side. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] lawfulreception 2011-11-06 02:57 am UTC (link)
	To be fair, no Judge can be completely trusted. Somehow I think the majority are going to go for the former. It's going in circles. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] onetruth 2011-11-06 02:58 am UTC (link)
	No kidding. Haah . . . this is ridiculous. (Reply to this) (Parent)

(Read comments) -