InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "Invite your friends to IJ!"

Royal (Lelouch Lamperouge) (zeromemories) wrote in sabra_la_tau,
@ 2011-11-05 16:48:00

Entry tags:

!days 280-289, aeris gainsborough, akin iyapo shing kaalnikanjlo, allen walker, aoi 'santa' kurashiki, apollo justice, ashikawa mitsuru, chrono, claude c. kenni, edward elric, ermillina 'snow white' curtana, excel, gokudera hayato, hizumi mizushiro, jace beleren, jake berenson, kanda yuu, kudo shinichi, kuroba kaito, lelouch lamperouge, lenalee lee, masahiro namiki, minami ikki, nabuca, nishi jouichirou, phoenix wright, raenef, selendis, tazendra, temma, wanijima akito, yuffie kisaragi, {{{akatsuki chika}}}

Who: Those invited
Where: Lyvus
When: Day 286, around noon (before the ideal world game)
What: Meeting!

[Sometime between late morning and early afternoon, people are coming over to Lyvus. They'll even feed you if you brought something to trade—there's certainly nice tea and lunch set out :) the main area of Lyvus is pretty big, and there is a long table that can easily sit at least 15-20 people, though it may start to get crowded after that, and some of the chairs are makeshift]

[There may also be some Lyvus/Monoceros makeshift scrabble games going on around lunch. This is clearly the most serious kidnapping.]

[OOCly I have no idea who is actually coming to the meeting and/or knows about it, but I think we are able to roll with bbbasically anything! Join #partyatlyvus so we can keep the blah blah in one place, and we can facilitate any necessary behind the scenes business o7]

[ pre-meeting | meeting start | current options | information sharing | spectators | violence | scowl's announcement | mirror discussion | keystones, etc ]

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 01:46 am UTC (link)
	drifting over, equally quietly I wonder if we can turn that to advantage? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] zeromemories 2011-11-06 01:50 am UTC (link)
	It's a better concept. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] tothelight 2011-11-06 01:56 am UTC (link)
	... [ glances at Jace, and Lelouch, and makes the slightest gesture at his head. ] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 02:16 am UTC (link)
	Lelouch will feel something akin to a polite knock on the outside of his bracer (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] zeromemories 2011-11-06 03:56 am UTC (link)
	[. . .] [long moment of hesitation, but then accepting that] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 03:58 am UTC (link)
	three-way communication link, active; the presence in your mind is very understated, only enough to speak silently. Power from a Judge doesn't dissipate when they die, but we don't know a way to harness it yet. Still... (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] zeromemories 2011-11-06 04:05 am UTC (link)
	Would a Judge know? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 04:10 am UTC (link)
	Most likely. I suspect it would be the same principle the Gentleman was referring to earlier, talking about the death of the world. (Reply to this) (Parent)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] tothelight 2011-11-06 04:03 am UTC (link)
	[ conference call is a-go ] [ A guy from Pyxis was taken by Mirror a couple of days ago-- she made him see some kind of vision for her--- and focusing hard on a memory, right up to "starting with Pyxis..." ] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] zeromemories 2011-11-06 04:05 am UTC (link)
	How well can we trust that it's not just a fabrication? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] tothelight 2011-11-06 04:07 am UTC (link)
	[ I don't know. It didn't look like he even remembered enough about himself yet to really say... But the fact that Mirror would take an interest in taking him like that even though he didn't know he could do something like that--- him, instead of anyone else-- couldn't that count for something? [ (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 04:09 am UTC (link)
	If he's actually a precognitive...I don't think we've ever had one here. It seems a lot of trouble to go through to spread disinformation, though; thus far, that hasn't been her style. Invasive replacement and sabotage, yes; disinformation, less so. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] zeromemories 2011-11-06 04:19 am UTC (link)
	Especially not to someone from whom information would come as a surprise. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] tothelight 2011-11-06 04:23 am UTC (link)
	[ And with how she reacted, the threat to everyone... ... I'll be honest. There's a part of me that believes-- that wants to believe--- if she had her last piece back, she wouldn't be this Mirror. ...I know it's insane to even consider as an option, but... ] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 04:31 am UTC (link)
	...that makes me wonder...isn't her other personality still there? Suppressed, but there. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] zeromemories 2011-11-06 04:32 am UTC (link)
	Elaborate—? Her other personality? (Reply to this) (Parent)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] tothelight 2011-11-06 04:32 am UTC (link)
	[ Kaito's seen it. Feathers has seen it. It's there. ] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE]

blue_mind_group
2011-11-06 04:44 am UTC (link)

Mirror wasn't always the way she is now. She used to be...broken. Literally. In that shape, she was actually kind; her games could be dangerous, but mostly through a lack of understanding rather than malice. She was sympathetic towards the Blanks in general, more so than most Judges.

Her games were about finding...pieces of herself. Aspects. Fragments. As she found them, the second personality began to manifest. Eventually they fought for dominance, using us as proxies, and the second one won.

I'm wondering if we might not benefit from trying to bring that original personality back. Whether by breaking her, or by...some other method.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] zeromemories 2011-11-06 04:51 am UTC (link)
	Restore one aspect of her and destroy the other. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] tothelight 2011-11-06 04:52 am UTC (link)
	[ ......could we do that? But how? ] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 04:54 am UTC (link)
	That's the question. I don't know if it's possible, but it would require separating them. Maybe breaking her would do it, or maybe it would just drive her original personality dominant and start the cycle over. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE]

zeromemories
2011-11-06 05:02 am UTC (link)

Either way, the option of simply destroying her isn't appealing—especially not without figuring out our next few steps. It's like capturing a piece in a strategy game simply because it's available, without considering that your next few moves might end in your own destruction. But there's no getting rid of the drive to destroy the problematic side of her in vengeance.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] tothelight 2011-11-06 05:06 am UTC (link)
	[ ... If it were any other one of us.... maybe Persona's power would be a way for that to happen. ] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 05:10 am UTC (link)
	...reluctantly She did it to Messenger once. That's how he got unbound. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] tothelight 2011-11-06 05:11 am UTC (link)
	[ --! You-- you're serious? ] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)