InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "2 (x)ist"

Royal (Lelouch Lamperouge) (zeromemories) wrote in sabra_la_tau,
@ 2011-11-05 16:48:00

Entry tags:

!days 280-289, aeris gainsborough, akin iyapo shing kaalnikanjlo, allen walker, aoi 'santa' kurashiki, apollo justice, ashikawa mitsuru, chrono, claude c. kenni, edward elric, ermillina 'snow white' curtana, excel, gokudera hayato, hizumi mizushiro, jace beleren, jake berenson, kanda yuu, kudo shinichi, kuroba kaito, lelouch lamperouge, lenalee lee, masahiro namiki, minami ikki, nabuca, nishi jouichirou, phoenix wright, raenef, selendis, tazendra, temma, wanijima akito, yuffie kisaragi, {{{akatsuki chika}}}

Who: Those invited
Where: Lyvus
When: Day 286, around noon (before the ideal world game)
What: Meeting!

[Sometime between late morning and early afternoon, people are coming over to Lyvus. They'll even feed you if you brought something to trade—there's certainly nice tea and lunch set out :) the main area of Lyvus is pretty big, and there is a long table that can easily sit at least 15-20 people, though it may start to get crowded after that, and some of the chairs are makeshift]

[There may also be some Lyvus/Monoceros makeshift scrabble games going on around lunch. This is clearly the most serious kidnapping.]

[OOCly I have no idea who is actually coming to the meeting and/or knows about it, but I think we are able to roll with bbbasically anything! Join #partyatlyvus so we can keep the blah blah in one place, and we can facilitate any necessary behind the scenes business o7]

[ pre-meeting | meeting start | current options | information sharing | spectators | violence | scowl's announcement | mirror discussion | keystones, etc ]

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] lawfulreception 2011-11-06 01:22 am UTC (link)
	[blinks] Ah. . .it's still weird, but that doesn't seem so bad. I can consider, though honestly, I want to confirm why any information needs to be hidden. As I said, Mirror doesn't care, and would probably point and laugh while another Judge got the axe. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 01:26 am UTC (link)
	Personally, I'm of the opinion that this is more a failsafe against Ophiuchus and King than Mirror. Since someone was rather blatantly indiscreet, it could well be that someone other than her might have been paying attention. I plan to offer this generally to anyone who feels the need; I've already put it in place on a few members of Delphinus. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] lawfulreception 2011-11-06 01:30 am UTC (link)
	So. . .basically, you're trusting us to trigger it at appropriate times, even with our stance on Mirror. Hell, we may not have to even use it at all. [8\|a] Let me talk with Quartz first? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE]

blue_mind_group
2011-11-06 01:37 am UTC (link)

You're not exactly the only one in this room with a dangerous patron. It seems more than a bit hypocritical to judge you solely based on that association, when you haven't otherwise given us reason for distrust.

*nods*

I doubt anything will be settled for a while; take whatever time you need. Understand, though, that I might not be able to guarantee that certain of the more vehement members of this meeting will accept my solution.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] lawfulreception 2011-11-06 01:42 am UTC (link)
	H-haha, yes, I know. But it's good to know it's there as an option. Thanks. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 01:47 am UTC (link)
	Not a problem. (Reply to this) (Parent)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] onetruth 2011-11-06 01:47 am UTC (link)
	Hmm? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] lawfulreception 2011-11-06 01:55 am UTC (link)
	Jace wants to put a temporary voluntary trigger in my mind, that I can activate to seal off information as I see fit. . . . Also apparently they are going to try to break Mirror, which is nothing new, aside from the fact that I guess they are trying to right now. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] onetruth 2011-11-06 02:03 am UTC (link)
	. . . how safe is it? Not that I'm doubting Jace's power, but . . . . . . [snort] Is that so. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] lawfulreception 2011-11-06 02:07 am UTC (link)
	From the sounds of it, it seems like I'll have completely control over when it happens. It's still strange though. Yeeeeaah. . .[And if you want to eavesdrop] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] onetruth 2011-11-06 02:10 am UTC (link)
	. . . it at least sounds better than them forcibly removing our memories. [you bet your ass I am] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] lawfulreception 2011-11-06 02:18 am UTC (link)
	There's talk of getting a seal from an nondescript Judge as well. . . [glancing at . . .] (Is it worth the risk, asking her. . .would the others even agree?) (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] onetruth 2011-11-06 02:21 am UTC (link)
	And what would that do? Wouldn't she notice something like that? [:/] (. . . if you're thinking at me, I can't see it, Badger.) (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] lawfulreception 2011-11-06 02:27 am UTC (link)
	She'd notice anything, I think, though they're saying this seal is untraceable. . . (Ah--wait a second. Jeeze, I really miss Almaz.) [KER-WHISPER] Do you think she would? Help them, I mean. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] onetruth 2011-11-06 02:29 am UTC (link)
	Do they have proof of that? I don't want us getting in trouble with her. (Sorry I'm not Almaz.) . . . I . . . couldn't say? She may consider it if it benefited her in some way. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] -

lawfulreception, 2011-11-06 02:34 am UTC

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] -

onetruth, 2011-11-06 02:36 am UTC

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] -

lawfulreception, 2011-11-06 02:42 am UTC

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] -

onetruth, 2011-11-06 02:44 am UTC

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] -

lawfulreception, 2011-11-06 02:57 am UTC

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] -

onetruth, 2011-11-06 02:58 am UTC

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] noicequeen 2011-11-06 01:52 am UTC (link)
	You really can do that? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 02:14 am UTC (link)
	nods I'm very good at what I do. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] noicequeen 2011-11-06 02:21 am UTC (link)
	Maybe we can trade tips one of these days. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 02:23 am UTC (link)
	nods That could be interesting. Which reminds me...if we do end up using my solution, make sure to tell Valerian not to poke it. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] noicequeen 2011-11-06 02:24 am UTC (link)
	Afraid he's better at this than you are? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 02:27 am UTC (link)
	snorts No. He's not good enough to examine it without triggering it, and that'd be awkward. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] noicequeen 2011-11-06 02:31 am UTC (link)
	Good point. [may have been planning on playing around with it herself...] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 02:33 am UTC (link)
	probably unwise >> I'll have to design it so that it activates in response to any probe of the mechanism or the memories it guards, and it'll act fast to prevent anything from stopping it. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] noicequeen 2011-11-06 02:46 am UTC (link)
	So if a Judge goes looking, it won't show up. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] blue_mind_group 2011-11-06 02:49 am UTC (link)
	Unlikely, at least. They might see it trigger, but they won't get their hands on what it's protecting. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] -

noicequeen, 2011-11-06 02:53 am UTC

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] -

blue_mind_group, 2011-11-06 03:32 am UTC

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] -

noicequeen, 2011-11-06 03:35 am UTC

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] -

blue_mind_group, 2011-11-06 03:44 am UTC

Re: [WHY ARE WE HERE] -

noicequeen, 2011-11-06 03:59 am UTC

(Read comments) -