Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "Whatever you say, sifu-hotman."

River (breaking_waves) wrote in sabra_la_tau,
@ 2010-11-22 13:20:00

Entry tags:

!days 190-199, ashikawa mitsuru, yamamoto takeshi, {jack harkness}, {meer campbell}, {{{hakuba saguru}}}

Who: River + Orion
Where: Orion!!
When: Day 194, early morning
What: Collecting!

[KNOCK KNOCK]

Ophiuchus! Time's up on your mission, Orion! Please put everything in the folder.

((OH GOSH I meant to post this earlier and stuff happened and then more stuff and more so it's going up NOW when NOBODY IS ON. COMMENT WITH YOUR DRAWINGS, GUYS! just drop in anytime you can and feel free to ping me. And PM me to let me know what you want for your mission!))

(Post a new comment)

	[TURN IN] breaking_waves 2010-11-22 06:23 pm UTC (link)
	((Drawings go here anytime!!)) (Reply to this) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] cpt_touchwood 2010-11-22 06:51 pm UTC (link)
	You should really come by more often. [drops 5 practically identical drawings in the folder] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] breaking_waves 2010-11-22 08:04 pm UTC (link)
	You think so? (Reply to this) (Parent)

	Re: [TURN IN] breaking_waves 2010-11-22 08:05 pm UTC (link)
	[--oh man your drawings] Ha ha ha! (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] cpt_touchwood 2010-11-22 09:09 pm UTC (link)
	What can I say, so far I'm betting I've left a small but specific impression. Anyway, false modesty is unbecoming. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] breaking_waves 2010-11-22 10:48 pm UTC (link)
	Looks just like you, I gotta admit. Why so lazy? Seems like a waste. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] cpt_touchwood 2010-11-22 10:58 pm UTC (link)
	A waste being lazy? Maybe. I'm still working on finding my niche. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] breaking_waves 2010-11-22 11:21 pm UTC (link)
	Still new, yeah? Confidence is a good start. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] cpt_touchwood 2010-11-22 11:33 pm UTC (link)
	Man, how much longer do I qualify as new? [laughs] I'd say I'm off and running, then. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-23 12:22 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

cpt_touchwood, 2010-11-23 12:55 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-23 01:00 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

cpt_touchwood, 2010-11-23 01:14 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-23 04:08 pm UTC

	Re: [TURN IN] smoothdetecting 2010-11-22 10:00 pm UTC (link)
	I hope this will suffice. puts in five pictures of his own (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] breaking_waves 2010-11-22 10:49 pm UTC (link)
	... Why'd you write their names as numbers? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] smoothdetecting 2010-11-22 10:54 pm UTC (link)
	You never said we had to explain our drawings. I drew a code. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] breaking_waves 2010-11-22 11:03 pm UTC (link)
	Yeah, but I said it had to be a picture... I don't get this at all. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] smoothdetecting 2010-11-22 11:04 pm UTC (link)
	It is a picture. A picture of numbers using names. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] breaking_waves 2010-11-22 11:05 pm UTC (link)
	That's writing. What was so hard about a picture? It's not like what Kelvin did was hard. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] smoothdetecting 2010-11-22 11:06 pm UTC (link)
	It is a picture. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-22 11:08 pm UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

smoothdetecting, 2010-11-22 11:12 pm UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-22 11:15 pm UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

smoothdetecting, 2010-11-22 11:17 pm UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-22 11:20 pm UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

smoothdetecting, 2010-11-22 11:26 pm UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-22 11:31 pm UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

smoothdetecting, 2010-11-22 11:33 pm UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-22 11:54 pm UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

smoothdetecting, 2010-11-22 11:59 pm UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-23 12:21 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

smoothdetecting, 2010-11-23 12:32 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-23 12:54 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

smoothdetecting, 2010-11-23 12:57 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-23 12:58 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

cpt_touchwood, 2010-11-23 01:00 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-23 01:03 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

cpt_touchwood, 2010-11-23 01:08 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-23 01:10 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

cpt_touchwood, 2010-11-23 01:18 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-23 01:22 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

cpt_touchwood, 2010-11-23 01:55 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-23 02:00 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

cpt_touchwood, 2010-11-23 03:53 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-23 04:06 pm UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

cpt_touchwood, 2010-11-23 05:25 pm UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

idealies, 2010-11-23 05:22 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

cpt_touchwood, 2010-11-23 07:59 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

idealies, 2010-11-23 08:01 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

cpt_touchwood, 2010-11-23 08:14 am UTC

Re: [TURN IN] -

breaking_waves, 2010-11-23 04:07 pm UTC

	Re: [TURN IN] idealies 2010-11-22 11:15 pm UTC (link)
	[la la la 1, 2, 3, 4, 5] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] breaking_waves 2010-11-22 11:23 pm UTC (link)
	[yaaay] Great, this'll do nicely. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] idealies 2010-11-23 05:20 am UTC (link)
	Really? Good! (Reply to this) (Parent)

	Re: [TURN IN] byallmeans 2010-11-23 01:42 am UTC (link)
	[Submit: a group of purposefully vague, symbolic crayon drawings.] (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] breaking_waves 2010-11-23 01:55 am UTC (link)
	. . . [see if I ever accept giving this easy a mission again.] Well, at least they're drawings. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] byallmeans 2010-11-23 01:59 am UTC (link)
	They are. And they tell more than trying to draw expressions with a crayon would have. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] breaking_waves 2010-11-23 02:14 am UTC (link)
	I do understand a sentiment from them, so they're clear so you pass. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] byallmeans 2010-11-23 02:25 am UTC (link)
	Good. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	Re: [TURN IN] breaking_waves 2010-11-23 04:08 pm UTC (link)
	So, I just need two more. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

Re: [TURN IN] -

byallmeans, 2010-11-24 11:23 am UTC