Branch ([info]branchandroot) wrote in [info]metametameta,
*considers* What you want, then, isn't something that means "no offensive content", because that's another negative space description. If the true axis of description is offense or triggering, then it really would be most appropriate to use a range of positive and negative descriptors: this may do so, this will not do so. If you want to use only positive descriptors, than you need a different axis of description. Maybe clarifying that would help.

Actually, I wonder if what you want isn't General. The way you describe the categories seems to be tending in that direction. It isn't that Asimov and Dickinson don't deal with sex and death and politics and all of that, because they certainly do; it's just that they do so in a general way in contrast to an author like Blake, who does it explicitly.

I do think that Standard might also want a bit of rephrasing, if that's the case. Though I'm even less sure what you might use there instead!

(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
( )OpenID
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.

[ Home | Update Journal | Login/Logout | Search | Browse Options | Site Map ]