fairestcat (![[info]](https://www.insanejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} fairestcat) wrote in ![[info]](https://www.insanejournal.com/img/community.gif){kind=small} metafandom,@ 2008-03-19 19:54:00 |
 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
- svartalfur: Strike, meta, and strike-meta (or meta-strike?) - What if we used the same Friday to create a permanent upward spike in the daily-posts statistics of InsaneJournal? What if everyone of us posted a short piece of meta at their IJs that day? -
- penknife: It won't hurt anything, but I don't think it'll work. - I don't think SUP cares if the fan community goes away. I don't think SUP cares if long-term users who hate ads go away. I think SUP would really like the people posting porn to go away. I think they don't want us here. -
- darkrosetiger: The Rodney McKay Principle of Consumerism as applied to LiveJournal - 6A and SUP, however, seem to forget that without the users they would have no product to sell to advertisers. With 6A, the primary problem seemed to be incompetence on their part[...]//With SUP, unfortunately, the problem seems to go deeper than that -
- selenak: My Best Enemy - So, I wonder, what is it that makes friends-turned-enemies pairings to appealing to me? -
- briar_pipe: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle - an approach to lj - I'm looking into the possibility of not closing old/inactive communities and journals and of recycling them instead. Accounts numbering before about 15,136,000 still have the option to remain basic (without the ads). So I need your help, guys, to figure o -
- reddwarfer: Boycott Metaishness - It kinda makes me laugh, too, because of the weird sense of entitlement people come across as having in regards to Live Journal. Live Journal is a business like any other. They can do what they want, so long as it isn't against the law, and they really do -