Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "I need to shut my mouth!"

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

Mercury Chaos ([info]mercurychaos) wrote in [info]f_t_m,
@ 2009-08-12 21:06:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:media/news, resources: europe

News.
The Council of Europe has published an issue paper on human rights and gender identity which can be downloaded as a PDF.

The document states that the requirements for trans people undergo surgery in order to have their gender marker changed:

"...clearly run counter to the respect for the physical integrity of the person. To require sterilisation or other surgery as a prerequisite to enjoy legal recognition of one’s preferred gender ignores the fact that while such operations are often desired by transgender persons, this is not always the case. Moreover, surgery of this type is not always medically possible, available, or affordable without health insurance funding. The treatment may not be in accordance with the wishes and needs of the patient, nor prescribed by his/her medical specialist."


Later on it describes two court rulings that support the position that surgery should not be required for a legal name or gender change:
"On 27 February 2009, the Austrian Administrative High Court ruled that mandatory surgery was not a prerequisite for gender (and name) change.25 A transgender woman, who underwent all changes apart from the genital surgery and lived as a woman in all social relations, could establish to the court that her particular employment situation would not be conducive to the several months’ sick leave needed for the operation and that she could not leave her family financially uncared for. This led the court to point out that the legislator had to abolish the original requirement since the court was not able to establish any need for this specific requirement pertaining to transsexual women. In Germany, the Federal Supreme Court has indicated in a judgment that 'an operative intervention as a precondition for the change of gender is increasingly regarded as problematic or no longer tenable among experts'."


On the diagnosis of Gender Identity Disorder as a mental illness:
"Alternative classifications should be explored in close consultation with transgender persons and their organisations.37 From a human rights and health care perspective no mental disorder needs to be diagnosed in order to give access to treatment for a condition in need of medical care."


However, they still acknowledge the medical necessity of HRT and surgery:
The case law of the European Court of Human Rights clearly requires states not only to provide for the possibility to undergo surgery leading to full gender-reassignment, but also that insurance plans should cover ‘‘medically necessary’’ treatment in general, which gender reassignment surgery is part of.38 The ruling of the Court has been successfully referred to by transgender people in several countries, such as Lithuania and Belgium, to extend the coverage of their health insurance. This standard should be implemented in all Council of Europe member states.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]mercurychaos
2009-08-14 07:08 pm UTC (link)
They did say "alternative classifications", and I'm getting the sense that this means it would be a medical diagnosis, rather than a psychological one. I think this makes a whole lot of sense.

My therapist never actually gave me a formal diagnosis of GID, but there are a lot of countries where you cannot get access to treatment without one. And down the road that diagnosis can cause problems - someone might be barred from entering certain occupations or kept from serving in the military or civil service, on the grounds that they have been diagnosed with a mental disorder. I'm not saying that changing the way it's diagnosed would remove all the stigma from being trans, but I think it'd go a long way in combating the myth that it's the result of mental illness.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Read comments) -


Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs