It does not make me any more inclined to agree with you to be told that my regard for the rights of others is based in ignorance and privilege.
Even as you are vehemently arguing we should take your word that there is nothing redeemable about this entire group that could theoretically appear, you've already expressed that one of your own friends was previously part of this group and was redeemed.
Do you not find that runs counter to what you're claiming?