InsaneJournal Announcements

Emperor Time does not allow this relationship lords and the people have too much under development. China since Soccer Cleats Discount Store ancient times to engage in a centralized, top of the emperor, the following is a compilation families together people, what I call the "big community-based" state. If the emperor as "the only Lord", and that together the people, rich and poor households compiled on all his "serfs", so, no one is Chinese "middle class." However, most of them are the state's taxpayers! And if you do not take into account the membership of the emperor, only in terms of civil relationships, and that since the days of China from the Qin Shi Huang is a typical "middle class society", whether poor or rich, because they are neither serfs nor serf it! If you insist on sets this argument, it can only say: There are autocratic emperor, even a middle-class Chinese are not (all are his servant), no the dictatorship, the Chinese have become middle class of all (not all of each master and servant). In other words, in Europe, the formation of the middle class is to establish democratic conditions. Adidas Soccer Shoes Outlet But in China on the contrary, logically, the establishment of democracy is the emergence of the conditions of the middle class!Of course, this is the original meaning of "middle class." But when it comes to middle-income people, then Iwould say that polarization is a kind of instability in any society, the wealth gap is not easy of course, stable and democratic society, but the disparity is the stability of authoritarian societies do? Disparity conditions dangerous to start the democracy, of course, but the disparity between rich and poor conditions of tyranny it not dangerous to maintain? "Immutability middle class have perseverance, no middle class without constant perseverance" Since ancient times is the reason, and democracy, undemocratic ware? Chinese history, time and time again how bloody chaos is come? Is it because to engage in a democracy? So of course we must avoid serious polarization. I emphasize that this is fair, but with the "power of democracy" has nothing to do. Indeed, the power of democracy should be the main non-slave non-free people, the country's taxpayers, as long as the start of political reform, China has never been shortage of such people. As for what the poor do not like democracy, the rich do not like democracy, only not Nike CR MercurialVapor Superfly III poor not rich people like democracy, or just like to say that only capitalist democracy, it is neither logical nor true.