InsaneJournal Announcements

I don't argue with that, but I will say that I believe there must be a better way to define 'inactive' because there is a world of difference between a journal with one blank entry and a journal with 50+ entries of content that continues to be read and enjoyed by those of us who are active on the site. The only thing I wanted to point out is that there are journals currently being deleted that contain creative, interesting content that continues to enrich the site even though their owners have long ceased being active. For those of us who are active that content is a loss, but we have no control over it and cannot even archive pages once a journal has gone into 'delete' status.

I think most of us recognise that the site is not an archive for our content and are appreciative of what Squeaky does. Ultimately as Squeaky is the owner he can do whatever he deems necessary. Those of us who have not changed email addresses, died, or in other words still care about our content will go through and 'activate' our accounts and hope others will do the same. But I do view the loss of that content as a loss for the site. That's just me personally, and obviously others may and clearly do feel differently.