Snapedom

The November Challenge

The World of Severus Snape

********************
Community News:
********************
Check out the Severus Big Bang Birthday Bash!

We now host the S.N.A.P.E. ArtPad contest (Snarc). Come, take a look and join the fun!

Take a look at the Monthly Challenges of the past and check out the newest ones. Write for any challenge you like.

Suggest topics for future challenges.


********************

Welcome to snapedom!
If you want to see snapedom entries on your LJ flist, add snapedom_syn feed. But please remember to come here to comment.

This community is mostly unmoderated. Read the rules and more in "About Snapedom."

No fanfic, but you can pimp your fanfic and fanart every Friday.

No shipping wars!

The November Challenge

Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
was suggested by [info]territesting

Severus and the Dark Arts!

Was he fascinated by the Dark Arts? Did he love them, as Harry suspected? Was he seduced by them?

Or did he fear them? Was that why he became such an outstanding DADA teacher? Was he driven to defend himself because he was almost killed by a Dark Creature, Remus Lupin in his werewolf form?

Was he so good at DADA because he loved or feared the Dark Arts? Or did he have to be interested to endear himself to his Dark Lord?

Where did he learn about them? Did he read about them in his mother's books? Did she teach him? Or did he learn them in Slytherin?
  • Well,in canon he seems to be practicing some kind of Dark Magic already before he was a student at Hogwarts,that suggests that his mother was the one who taught him.I refer here to Sirius'remark in OotP, to the scene in DH where he makes a branch drop on Petunia (though this was not deliberately done) and to his performance of shooting down flies from the ceiling in OotP(does one have to use Avada Kedavra for this???).If his mother was practicing Dark Magic that doesn't really go with her being married to a muggle....
    • I'd take Sirius' statement with a grain of salt, if I were you - he is not an impartial witness here. He has a history of bitter acrimony with Snape, is going by recollections more than a dozen years old (post-Azkaban!), and has every motive to want to paint Harry's father in the best (and Snape the worst) possible light when speaking to Harry. Admitting that James attacked him fr "existing" does not fit the bill, but claiming Snape was a proto-DE as a young child, already enmeshed with 'evil' magic (if that's what the Dark Arts are) who needed to be taken down a peg? Much better.

      The branch did not read to me as having ANYTHING to do with Dark Magic, unless ALL the wandless, accidental magic children perform before attending school is "Dark." Harry blows up his Aunt by accident even AFTER he starts school; emotional outbursts of magic seem to be perfectly normal. (The "lie" comment reads to me as authorial insertion.)

      The flies incident appeared to me to take place when Severus was a teenager - i.e. had already been at Hogwarts for a few years. I rather think he picked up whatever Dark Arts he studied as a child/young man before joining the DEs AFTER he started at school and realized he was the chosen target of a gang of Gryffindor bullies.
    • Just my thoughts! The idea of his mother teaching him Dark Arts is an intriguing one however. :)
      • (Anonymous)
        I also find Sirius an impartial witness - more than that he is proven throughout the books to be a somewhat bad judge of character.

        Even after he KNOWS Peter managed to be a spy within the Order for a YEAR, he underestimates him in the Shrieking Shack, choosing to let a werewolf (who is about to go thru the change) and a boy with a broken leg guard him, so HE can bounce Snape's head off the tunnel ceiling. There are several different ways that COULD have been handled differently.

        And then there's his opinion of his family - whom he calls ALL of them dark - despite the fact that the blast marks on the family tree say otherwise. They can't ALL be dark if every generation seems to have someone who married a muggleborn or muggle or 'blood traitor' or was born a squib. And what does it say about Sirius IF he accepted money from Uncle Alphard IF said uncle was 'dark'. Unless it was purely to oldest nephew from childless uncle? The implication was that Alphard ONLY left money to Sirius - if he had left an even amount to Regulus then he would not have been blasted off the tree.

        And he was quite wrong about Regulus as well. -- Hwyla
        • (Anonymous)
          As for his mother teaching young Sev 'dark arts' - I certainly hope she was too depressed to even cast magic, otherwise I can't imagine she left him in all those ill-fitting clothes as a child.

          Yes, many witches and wizards don't know how to dress like muggles, but she certainly knew if something didn't even 'fit' even if she didn't know 'style' - and she SHOULD have been at least somewhat aware of the style of muggle mens clothing - she had her muggle husband as an example.

          And what would be the point of showing us a depressed Merope and Tonks, with limited magic, if not to clue us to Eileen?

          We also have the evidence of just what kind of curses Snape was using at the time Lily drops him. A whole book of them that HARRY finds 'funny' and similar to something Fred & George would cast.

          With the one exception of SectumSempra (which I still don't believe he invented) the worst seems to be the toenail growing one (for possible pain). Are we to believe that Harry in 6th year would consider a 'dark arts' lover as a good friend? Are we to believe HARRY was 'dark' since he was using these same curses?

          And there's the proof of the 'He Exists' reason in SWM. IF it really ever was about Snape being 'dark' then James would have said so when Lily asked him why they picked on Snape. Not one word of 'darkness' is thrown around by either James or Sirius - it's all about Snape's appearance. -- Hwyla
          • Sectumsempra

            Oh, I think he might well have invented Sectumsempra, Hwyla. Consider the timing: he had survived an encounter with a dark creature that might easily have killed him, and the very boys who had (he believed) deliberately set up that near-murder were still tormenting him for fun, because "he existed" and they were bored. I think he invented - or discovered - Sectumsempra and went "dark" in response to this. There is really no evidence at all in the text that young Severus knew of any Dark spells prior to SWM and the werewolf incident.

            What I see is a stressed, isolated boy determined to defend himself because he knows no one else will do it. And yes, his basic temperament is very like Harry's, except that Severus is more introverted and sensitive. But I've seen these two as spiritual twins for years, just as Sirius's spiritual twin is Bellatrix.
        • I also find Sirius an impartial witness

          ...? Did you mean "unreliable" witness?
          • (Anonymous)
            Argg! Yes - I meant unreliable - where WAS my head - apparently not watching my typing.

            The actual wording I meant to type was that I find Sirius to be a far from impartial witness. I suppose what I was really looking for was what the court would call a 'hostile witness' -- Hwyla
    • Actually we have no evidence at all, including in Sirius' words, that Severus knew or practiced dark magic pre-Hogwarts. He knew some curses in first year (more than the typical 7th year, but the typical 7th year doesn't know that many) - which he could have picked up in a book at Flourish and Blotts (Curses and Countercurses by Vindictus Viridian?) when he came to do his pre-Hogwarts shopping. Being 'up to the eyeballs in the Dark Arts' or famous for Dark Arts knowledge probably dates to after the Shrieking Shack business because Lily doesn't seem to be aware of anything 'wrong' about Severus except the company he keeps and finding *other people's* Dark magic (whatever it was) funny.

      Combined with the fact that canon does not provide a coherent explanation of what Dark Arts are, well...

      We do know Severus himself considers Sectumsempra to be Dark magic. I'm guessing he started using and developing Dark spells after he was nearly eaten by a Dark creature and the attack was dismissed by the authorities. He needed stronger spells to stay alive because his peers were out to get him and he couldn't rely on the support of the system.
      • Curses and Countercurses by Vindictus Viridian?

        I still like the idea that that's Severus pen-name or that he ghost-wrote it. "Revenge" and "green"? It has JKR-style joke all over it.

        (OTOH Vindictus Viridian appears in portrait form in the PoA film and the OotP game, which if we chose to accept these as evidence says at least that he's dead, and he's in a style of dress that suggests 18th century to me, so it must be considered a real classic on the subject if it's still in print in Harry's day. Then again that dress could crop up later in the WW than it would in the Muggle world.)
        • I like the idea of Severus being Viridian - at least he can save some cash for his post-war escape from the royalties. But similar books must have been available for ever. Hermione shows that a dedicated child can learn to perform spells from books and experimentation in a short time. There is no need for an extended training in magic to learn a couple of curses if one is so inclined.
    • Snape's mum

      Agree with 00sevvie, but also--
      there's NO necessary logical connection, positive or negative, between being interested in/versed in Dark magic and being prejudiced against either Muggleborns or Muggles

      One could be trained in Dark arts & prejudiced against Muggles/Muggleborns (DE's, presumably)
      Trained in Dark arts & accepting of Muggleborns at least (Krum, Slughorn)
      Dislike Dark arts & prejudiced against Muggleborns (Fudge, according to Dumbles)
      Hate Dark arts & not prejudiced against Muggleborns, but dislike Muggles (Molly W-remember her 1st comment on platform)
      Hate DA, not prejudiced against Muggleborns, condescending like Muggles (Arthur)
      • Re: Snape's mum

        Oh, a good point there about the lack of connection. The only actual connection, really, is that in the books Slytherins are painted (accurately or not) as all being both prejudiced against Muggles and Muggleborns, and steeped in the Dark Arts. It's like Slytherin is the trashbin for things the other Houses don't want to acknowledge about themselves... regardless of logic, compassion, or anything else.
    • Well,in canon he seems to be practicing some kind of Dark Magic already before he was a student at Hogwarts,that suggests that his mother was the one who taught him.I refer here to Sirius'remark in OotP

      Sirius claims Severus knew some curses, which is not one and the same as Dark magic. How could Sirius know what Severus did or did not know on arrival? How does he know what seventh-years do or do not know, for that matter? And from what we see in canon, you wouldn't need to know all that much to know "more than half of the seventh-years".

      to the scene in DH where he makes a branch drop on Petunia (though this was not deliberately done)

      You agree it's not deliberate (I agree as well), yet count it as "Dark"? I don't follow. And is all uncontrolled children's magic then "Dark" (Harry teleporting or flying, the glass at the zoo, Neville bouncing when dropped)?

      his performance of shooting down flies from the ceiling in OotP(does one have to use Avada Kedavra for this???).

      He's described as a teenager so he was already attending Hogwarts at that point. The spell is not described with AK's characteristic green flash, nor would it be necessary to use that spell to "shoot down" flies (you could Vanish their wings, for example). What he is doing is perhaps not nice (not that people don't swat flies all the time) but it needn't be a "Dark" spell. I don't see that it's different than simply hitting them physically unless we had more information about what he was shooting them with.
      • (Anonymous)
        Good point about the green light! And since there wasn't a red light either, he isn't stunning them.

        For all we know he is practicing his Pertificus Totalis, since that one doesn't seem to have an accompanying light. A hex Hermione used in her first year. A fly that suddenly can't move IS likely to fall. And it would be a good spell to practice if one expects to be attacked, since it would prevent the other person from casting anything else at you.

        My personal theory regarding Sirius' comment is that Snape came into first year knowing a lot of spells - possibly one he got straight from a book - JUST like Hermione. Remember Ron actually called her 'scary' for using the Petrificus Totalis on Neville, despite the fact that we see the same spell used by Albus later in the books (to freeze Harry on the Tower)

        I think he just knew more than the other first years. But then we have Lucius welcoming him after sorting (and Sirius calling him Lucius' Lapdog) and Sirius also accusses him of hanging out with these older Slytherins. And in Gryffindor the older kids pretty much ignore the younger kids UNLESS they are either family or on the Quidditch team with them.

        But in Slytherin, their Head of House at the time encouraged and ran a club that not only had different ages together, but different houses. I therefore tend to believe that Lucius learned his 'networking skills' from Sluggy and 'collected' his own useful people to know. And that he soon saw Snape as a possibly useful person to collect in the future, just based on his intelligence.

        So, I tend to think the Marauders just could not understand how this firstie (and maybe a few others firsties as well) were being allowed to hang out with 5th years and older. And they just decided that since Sev knew things THEY didn't know then that must also be the reason the older kids wanted him around - the only thing the Marauders could imagine Older Slytherins wanting were 'dark curses', so of course Sev must have known them or otherwise why let him hang around? -- Hwyla

        I've always felt that 'Lapdog' meant that young Sev was somehow under Lucius' protection (and since Lucius appears to have been a prefect (I hope I'm correct on that?)
        • Yes, Lucius was a prefect (his badge is mentioned in the Prince's Tale). It's most likely he's a seventh-year in that scene, although it's also possible for him to have been a sixth-year.

          we have Lucius welcoming him after sorting

          Which is a bit curious, as I don't normally think of Lucius as the open, friendly sort, especially towards ragged-looking little specimens like Severus. It's very unlikely he somehow knew the child already. Perhaps he's just trying to look good, or maybe it's some "we Slytherins have to stick together" camaraderie, or maybe he's thinking "you never know, he could be brilliant, it could pay off in the future", as you suggested with the idea of "collecting" like Slughorn.

          On a Yahoo list I'm on, one of the folks from the UK often brings up the practice of "fagging", which is/was apparently common at boys' boarding schools, where a young new student becomes a personal servants of a sort for an older one, and says JKR might have been hinting that Severus was in this sort of a position with Lucius by having Sirius call him a "lap dog" even though Lucius is considerably older than Severus.
          • Yes, interesting that Lucius welcomed the boy in second-hand robes when Draco makes such a point at taking digs at the Weasleys' poverty. I doubt Lucius knew anything about Severus that moment but his Muggle name and his poor look. Which suggests the welcome was simply based on them being fellow Slytherins.
          • (Anonymous)
            Actually, I have always figured that was the case, 'Fagging' (as they call it) is done by picking a younger child to basically play 'gofer'. I kind of figured Lucius basically protected the half-blood in exchange for 'services' (such as returning library books, cleaning the dorm room, running to the Owlery) I did kind of expect this kind of situation specifically because it usually appears in your basic British Boarding School stories.

            In which case I think Lucius chose him more because he looked poor and was not known to be a pureblood. Much more likely to need protecting and be thankful for it. Might even have paid him something. Of course he might not have meant anything more by it than Percy did to Harry - it's unknown.

            It would somewhat explain why young Snape was allowed to hang out with the older kids - he was just there to run and fetch?

            It is interesting that Sirius rants about young Snape being friends with Bella and Lucius' Lapdog. Might be another of those things JKR got her math wrong on, but Bella should be through with school and Lucius is about 6 years older. The only way I can imagine it is IF she had intended for young firstie Snape to be hanging out with the 7th year Slytherins. Too bad we never find out -- Hwyla
          • (Anonymous)
            Which is a bit curious, as I don't normally think of Lucius as the open, friendly sort, especially towards ragged-looking little specimens like Severus.

            It's possible that his welcoming Snape at the feast didn't happen as such. It could be visual shorthand for, "Within weeks of Snape's sorting, Lucius had spotted his exceptional talent and taken him under his wing, thus starting him on the path to the dark side. This is why people refer to them as old friends. But there was no way to put all that in the flashback except as a montage moment that shouldn't be read as the literal truth".

            If it did happen, the most likely explanation is your suggestion of camaraderie between Slytherins. While I also like Hwyla's suggestion below that Snape fagged for Lucius, that wouldn't explain why Lucius acted nice to him when they met: a lordly seventh-year looking for a fag wouldn't be nice, he'd inform the poor kid that he's been chosen and his duties begin now.

            However that may be, if Lucius really was friendly to Snape at first sight, unprompted, it's the only time anyone was in all of canon. There's no way that wouldn't make a huge impression on the despised working-class boy.

            -L
  • how about both?

    I vote for both. Severus originally was enthralled with the Dark Arts, because they gave him power to defend against his enemies and distinguish himself. Even though they cost him Lily's friendship, they bought him membership in the Death Eaters and promised revenge against his tormentors. But Severus paid for the outcome of his Dark Arts knowledge in dear coin, so he quickly came to fear anything that might lead him into temptation.

    I believe that he is so good at DADA because he knows the subject so thoroughly, and he is eager for his students to learn to defend themselves and avoid the pitfalls that he faced.

    I seriously doubt, however, that teaching DADA would tempt Snape to revert into a Dark Arts-phile, because surely working among the Death Eaters would accomplish that much more effectively. Teaching pimple-faced brats about grindylows and hinkypunks hardly has the same draw.

    I believe Dumbledore denies Snape the DADA position because he knows it is cursed, and so Snape can have a reason to profess discontent with Dumbledore to the Death Eaters. IMHO, Snape may prefer teaching DADA to Potions because the students would probably pay better attention and he would have some good life lessons to teach, but he's probably not nearly as hungry for it as rumor has it.
  • We actually do get a definition, of sorts-

    After the ridiculous "Seven Potters" chapter, when George's ear is cut off with Sectumsempra, we find out it's a Dark Spell because its effects are permanent and cannot be reversed. At some point in an earlier discussion, I said, in that case, I think I would have become a Dark Arts geek myself. Because it's the only form of magic that's real. All the rest of it is just parlor tricks and illusions.

    But doesn't that mean that healing is a Dark Art? Or are we to think that all the healing spells are reversible?

    (In any case, Severus is a great healer, too. I see that as his role in the DEs.)

    One more thing here. Many of us are still convinced that only a racist would join the DEs and they were obviously bad by definition. But why do we think this? Isn't it more likely that the young recruits to this cult were deceived? That's how cult leaders usually work.

    BTW, I have a crack theory or two about Sev and Lily. If we are supposed to think that he did everything for Lily, why wouldn't he have joined the DEs, and perhaps even reported the prophecy, for Lily? Here's how it works: He joins up hoping that he can entice Lily to join, and that he will be able to protect her within the organization. When the prophecy comes along, he's already disillusioned and worried, but he thinks: Aha! Something that will give me leverage with the Dark Lord! Now I can protect Lily better! So he reports it, and immediately starts pleading for Lily - which becomes intensified when he discovers, to his horror, that she has become a target. Initially he wanted her to be a DE herself, and thought he could get her in if he was in Voldemort's favor.

    Sorry - I'm a bit off topic here! More to follow on my livejournal.
    • Re: We actually do get a definition, of sorts-

      But doesn't that mean that healing is a Dark Art? Or are we to think that all the healing spells are reversible?


      What is the difference between reversing a healing spell and causing an identical injury all over again?
    • Re: We actually do get a definition, of sorts-

      Regarding George's ear, if anyone were to find the part that was removed I bet Severus could sing it back into place. Also, Katie was eventually healed from the curse of the necklace. Perhaps Dark attacks are harder to heal but they do not *necessarily* cause permanent damage, it depends on the specific case.
    • Re: We actually do get a definition, of sorts-

      Also, RE George's ear: Lupin says it can't be fixed because it has "been cursed off." He does NOT actually say anything about the curse having been Dark or that it is only wounds caused by Dark spells that can't be healed. Whitehound, I think it is, has a great explanation of this distinction in more detail on hir site.
Powered by InsaneJournal