Tweak

InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "I'll be here when you get back"

Username: 
Password:    
Remember Me
  • Create Account
  • IJ Login
  • OpenID Login
Search by : 
  • View
    • Create Account
    • IJ Login
    • OpenID Login
  • Journal
    • Post
    • Edit Entries
    • Customize Journal
    • Comment Settings
    • Recent Comments
    • Manage Tags
  • Account
    • Manage Account
    • Viewing Options
    • Manage Profile
    • Manage Notifications
    • Manage Pictures
    • Manage Schools
    • Account Status
  • Friends
    • Edit Friends
    • Edit Custom Groups
    • Friends Filter
    • Nudge Friends
    • Invite
    • Create RSS Feed
  • Asylums
    • Post
    • Asylum Invitations
    • Manage Asylums
    • Create Asylum
  • Site
    • Support
    • Upgrade Account
    • FAQs
    • Search By Location
    • Search By Interest
    • Search Randomly

04nbod ([info]04nbod) wrote in [info]scans_daily,
@ 2009-04-16 13:45:00

Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: cheerful
Entry tags:char: green arrow/oliver queen, char: green lantern/hal jordan, char: supergirl/kara zor-el, title: justice league of america

DC Nation

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

big version- http://i44.tinypic.com/2zp3636.jpg

Stunning art but I can't help but notice only GL's eyeline is on Supergirl's face (she's 17 after all keep remembering that, 17,17,17)



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]bluefall
2009-04-16 02:57 pm UTC (link)
I should clarify. The Turning-Into-Trees picture that is the League's version of falling pearls or that stupid TKJ flashback has Diana in it (or for a while, Dinah). It does not have Supes or Bats. Clark's not in B&tB 29, and while both Clark and Bruce get lines in B&tB 30, they're not actually part of the story. And, as you say, the boys are never on the covers (or, particularly, in the first-page teasers, that I can recall). They were seldom in any of the other, non-tree-related flashbacks either, for a long time. That makes far more of a difference to what we're talking about here - association, thematic resonance, "what a League looks like" - than the theoretical roster. After all, the way you know "what a League looks like" is what you see on the pages and flashbacks and covers, the memorable splash pages and oft-referenced panels, and if the boys aren't getting page time or big battles or cover space, they're not going to be part of that image.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Read comments) -


Home | Site Map | Manage Account | TOS | Privacy | Support | FAQs