The Elf ½ (elfwreck) wrote in lexiconga, @ 2008-04-22 12:58:00 |
|
|||
Entry tags: | filings, patterson, rulings |
Filing 3 – Order to Show Cause
Description: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendant, RDR Books shall show cause as to why enjoining Defendant and its employees, agents, representatives and servants, from directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiffs' copyrights or trademarks, including but not limited to publishing or continuing to publish, distribute, market, advertise, promote, solicit or accept order for, sell or offer for sale Defendant's "Harry Potter Lexicon" book or any works derived or copied from Plaintiffs' copyrighted works or bearing Plaintiffs' trademarks and from participating or assisting in any such activity whether occurring with the United States or outside the United States, pending final judgment in this action. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant will produce documents responsive to the requests for production attached to the Declaration of Dale Cendali, Esq. on November 6, 2007. ORDERED that the briefing schedule for Plaintiffs' proposed motion for preliminary injunction shall be set as follows: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall be filed and served on November 8, 2007. Defendant's response, if any, will be served by overnight delivery or facsimile to counsel for Plaintiffs' on or before November 15, 2007. Plaintiffs' reply, if any, will be served by overnight delivery or facsimile to counsel for Defendant on or before November 19, 2007 at 9AM. A copy of this Order and Cendali Declaration will be served on Defendant by Fed EX for next day delivery on November 2, 2007. Show Cause Hearing set for 11/19/2007 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 24A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Robert P. Patterson. (Signed by Judge Robert P. Patterson on 11/2/07) (tro) (Entered: November 5, 2007)
Date Filed: November 2, 2007
Justia URL: http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/di
DISCLAIMER: IANAL. Fan resource, not a legal one.
Layman's description: Judge demands RDR/SVA say why they shouldn't be stopped from publication. Or maybe stops them from publication, pending an actual trial ruling. Anyway, this is the court saying "make a defense, or at least the start of one, or the ruling goes against you."