Okay, it looks like IE6 is throwing a real fit about the new layouts. See the very helpful screenshots in this comment.
I've given IJ-sitepage-body a width, so it should have layout and IJ-sitepage-nav should accept absolute positioning within it; apparently the problem is something more arcane.
If anyone has a copy of IE6 in easy reach and wants to poke at the problem, I'd hugely appreciate the help. The only copy I can get to is remote and I can't connect to anything /else/ while using it, which makes testing changes a bit of a trial.
Any ideas are welcome!
ETA: Height of the header is part of it; this... is going to be a pain. I might actually need to add a clearing div to the html code. More news as I can catch it.
ETA2: Triumph! Maybe. I think I've gotten it to play nicely with older IE, but if anyone has a copy of IE5 or 6 hanging around and could give it a test-drive once the code is live, that would be very helpful.
|
About this journal
IJ_siteschemes is where everyone involved in designing site schemes for IJ can exchange notes, documents and ideas. Membership is currently moderated, so please leave a comment for branchandroot if you'd like to join in.
|
Problems with IE6; help needed in testing
Re: One of the few advantages of having a decade-old computer is a copy of IE6
One of the few advantages of any Windows computer is the ability to use Multiple IE, which gives you all versions of IE going back to v.3.0. If you folks want IJ to be fully backward compatible to IE 4.0 (like LJ is), you need to test the CSS; this is the best way that I know how (download link with instructions follows - it installs from an executable that's easy as pie, then just click the icon for the version you want to use to open it - it's pretty straightforward). Re: One of the few advantages of having a decade-old computer is a copy of IE6
From what I understand, the desire to be compatible with 5 and 6 is the impetus behind Re: One of the few advantages of having a decade-old computer is a copy of IE6
"If you folks want IJ to be fully backward compatible to IE 4.0 (like LJ is)," |