InsaneJournal

Tweak says, "you done bad thing!"

Do You Need Me (Over), Do You Read Me (Over)? (info_estatic) wrote in dear_mun,
@ 2009-03-13 16:10:00

Current mood:

crazy

From darkerdarkest
Okay!

You've got it all figured out: my history (or what's worth mentioning), what I can do, how I came to be and this is really fucking awesome, honest.

You need to still write about my camera, but, whatever.

But but but. You know what I'd really really love? Come on, I'll bet you can guess!

SOMEONE TO TALK TO.

Sleepers are fun and all that marvelous jazz but really really? I need people. Thaaat guy is like...right there. With his disjointed journals and you're stopping me from commenting and WHYY?

Why?

Come on.

Really.

Ads by Project Wonderful! Your ad here, right now: $0

(Post a new comment)

	intrinsicrandom 2009-03-13 06:23 pm UTC (link)
	They aren't disjointed. (Reply to this) (Thread)

	info_estatic 2009-03-13 06:32 pm UTC (link)
	Are we reading the same blog posts? Really? Because, come on! You try and focus down on one thing and it becomes scattergories, swear to everything. It's COOL. It's just... Yeah, disjointed. Well that last one wasn't but it was only one line. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	intrinsicrandom 2009-03-13 06:35 pm UTC (link)
	You're disjointed. It isn't scattered. Everything's connected. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

info_estatic
2009-03-13 06:40 pm UTC (link)

Well yeah. Not on the me being disjointed part but on the everything being connected part. The problem is that you're not showing the lines from points A and J, you're just throwing the alphabet up there and expecting people to see the connection.

Everything is. Connected or not, everything exists everywhere and at every point in time. Me, you, all of it. You're trying to focus too much and if you're talking to the normals they aren't going to get it AT ALL.

(Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	intrinsicrandom 2009-03-13 06:43 pm UTC (link)
	There is absolutely, absolutely nothing wrong with focusing on more than one thing at a time. I couldn't do half of what I can do if I focused on one subject at a time. I don't even think I can focus on one topic. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	info_estatic 2009-03-13 06:46 pm UTC (link)
	You're bombarding readers with information. Which works, on one level, but it won't help the ones who are slow or are looking at things through a loop or a terrasect or whatever. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	intrinsicrandom 2009-03-13 06:49 pm UTC (link)
	It doesn't have anything to do with anyone else. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	info_estatic 2009-03-13 06:51 pm UTC (link)
	It should. You're a teacher. You should be expanding young minds and getting information out there, presumably without burning yourself and everyone around you out. What's the point in writing down all that stuff if you don't expect people to READ IT? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	intrinsicrandom 2009-03-13 06:54 pm UTC (link)
	I am? When did that happen? So I remember it. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	info_estatic 2009-03-13 06:57 pm UTC (link)
	You have amazing potential. The list of agencies falling over themselves to get you to work for them is a little frightening. If you aren't teaching people, you SHOULD be. When have you ever forgotten anything?? (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)

	empyromancy 2009-03-13 07:30 pm UTC (link)
	Shouldn't be too much longer. I think, anyway. I'm already doing things but they're probably not much fun by anyone's definition. (Reply to this) (Thread)

	empyromancy 2009-03-13 07:37 pm UTC (link)
	1.) Prostitution. 2.) Narrowly evading a serial killer. 3.) Alerting an Euthanatos to the fact that he maybe is going to kill me. (Reply to this) (Parent) (Thread)