LJ-SEC: (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY idragosani)

After nearly a year following the landmark rulling by Judge Jones (a Bush-appointed, Republican conservative judge, mind you) who ruled in Dover, PA that the teaching of Intelligent Design is unconstitutional, The Discovery Institture is now "accusing" Jones of well-nigh plagairizing findings provided to him by the ACLU. They are just about lumping Jones in as an "activist" judge now (meaning to these IDiots anyone who opposes to their pathetic excuse for science and thinly veiled creationism).

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=1186

*sigh* Pure spin, of course, this completely follows precedent of how judges collect information and concatenate before making their final decision.

The Panda's Thumb responds:

http://www.pandasthumb.org/archives/2006/12/weekend_at_behe.html

And Jason Rosenhouse from EvolutionBlog says:

http://scienceblogs.com/evolutionblog/2006/12/sandefur_and_brayton_on_fire.php