Project Mugetsu (![[info]](http://www.insanejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} mugetsu) wrote in ![[info]](http://www.insanejournal.com/img/community.gif){kind=small} commedia,@ 2009-08-06 14:58:00 |
 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Current mood: |  calm |
Polls for lurkers and members alike; backdated post
Two important questions to be answered; it will help direct the outcome of this asylum once I finish re-cataloguing my collection.
What I mean by filtering reviews marked as adults-only, is that members who are above the age of eighteen, with their DOB displayed in their profile according to IJ's ToS, are supposed to be reading and discussing on that review entry. That is to say, these entries will be closed to members only: which requires logging in. This is one of the polls down below.
The second poll/question is regarding the type of reviews I should be making; only one or the other! I don't want to go back and forth between spoilerific reviews and spoiler-free harmless reviews. One format =D
There's reasoning behind each choice; I don't want to butcher/analyze each and every comic book for the sake of jacking up the word-count or trying to look smart. However, on the other hand I don't want to dumb down the comic books from getting off topic by nitpicking at the art/writing/etc.
Poll #3608 Question #1: Adult entries members-locked
Open to: All, results viewable to: All
Should reviews marked as adult-only be members-locked?
Yes!
0 (0.0%)
No! 0 (0.0%)
I couldn't care less. 0 (0.0%)
Although minors can log in anyway, if it is breached the minor is at fault. 2 (100.0%)
Poll #3609 Question #2: What format should the reviews be in?
Open to: All, results viewable to: All
What format should the reviews (entries) be in?
100% spoiler free reviews; no criticism/comparison to other issues. 0 (0.0%)
Spoilerific reviews; disecting the story, writing, art; everything. 2 (100.0%)
I couldn't care less. 0 (0.0%)
|
|