![[info]](https://www.insanejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
* Offensive Content. Content that is defamatory, obscene, abusive, invasive of privacy, or otherwise objectionable, including content that constitutes child pornography, relates to bestiality, or depicts non-consensual sex acts.
Some fanfic depicts non-consensual sex acts. For that matter, a whole lot of mainstream romance depicts non-consensual sex acts; it's just considered okay if they "fall in love" after.
And the "otherwise objectionable" clause can be used to selectively ban anything the reviewer dislikes. This is always the case online - most TOS's have something like that - and it comes down to: do you trust the reviewer. I trust the staff here, who are in favor of fannish content and have a hands-off approach to content that isn't bothering anyone on the writer's friendslist.
I don't trust Amazon's reviewers, should they decide to look over InsaneJournal to decide if its content is suitable for their servers, or their business development plans, or whatever other reason they might discover to start investigating the contents of sites they host.
Some fanfic depicts non-consensual sex acts. For that matter, a whole lot of mainstream romance depicts non-consensual sex acts; it's just considered okay if they "fall in love" after.
And the "otherwise objectionable" clause can be used to selectively ban anything the reviewer dislikes. This is always the case online - most TOS's have something like that - and it comes down to: do you trust the reviewer. I trust the staff here, who are in favor of fannish content and have a hands-off approach to content that isn't bothering anyone on the writer's friendslist.
I don't trust Amazon's reviewers, should they decide to look over InsaneJournal to decide if its content is suitable for their servers, or their business development plans, or whatever other reason they might discover to start investigating the contents of sites they host.